<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://bloggingabout.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BBB - Bas Blogging 'Bout SharePoint - All Comments</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/default.aspx</link><description>Blog mainly about SharePoint and Fast for SharePoint</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Page Layout Error: 'Only Content controls are allowed directly in a content page that contains Content controls' </title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2009/03/10/page-layout-error-only-content-controls-are-allowed-directly-in-a-content-page-that-contains-content-controls.aspx#578476</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 01:03:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578476</guid><dc:creator>muhammad umer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am getting strange behaviour. My site works fine when i use the Administrator user. But when i create a group and add user with read permission, i get this error. i provided the group with full access even, but that doesnt work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any comment/idea from anyone appreciated&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578476" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SharePoint 2013 and Windows 8 apps - better together Part 2: Platform choice, using the right API and data access</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2013/03/17/sharepoint-2013-and-windows-8-apps-better-together-part-1-introduction-background-and-considerations.aspx#578398</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:41:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578398</guid><dc:creator>BBB - Bas Blogging 'Bout SharePoint</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the second post as part of a blog series about the integration of using SharePoint 2013 as a&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578398" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Indexing the new Geolocation field in SharePoint 2013 Technical preview is not possible</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/07/25/indexing-the-new-geolocation-field-in-sharepoint-2013-technical-preview-is-not-possible-yet.aspx#578350</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:09:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578350</guid><dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Antonio,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;missed out your comment. I didn&amp;#39;t verify this (yet). Going to check it out later this week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578350" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Error when deploying WebTemplate: "Error occurred in deployment step 'Add Solution': Exception from HRESULT: 0x8107026E"</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2011/01/14/error-when-deploying-webtemplate-quot-error-occurred-in-deployment-step-add-solution-exception-from-hresult-0x8107026e-quot.aspx#578324</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:23:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578324</guid><dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot...hit the bird&amp;#39;s eye&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578324" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Indexing the new Geolocation field in SharePoint 2013 Technical preview is not possible</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/07/25/indexing-the-new-geolocation-field-in-sharepoint-2013-technical-preview-is-not-possible-yet.aspx#578296</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:02:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578296</guid><dc:creator>Antonio Maio</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Bas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disappointed to read this as well. &amp;nbsp;Do you know if the functionality to index the geo-location column has in fact been implemented in the RTM version of SP2013? Have not had a chance to try this bit in SP2013 yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Antonio&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578296" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customizing ADFS login for SharePoint 2010: how we did it</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/12/28/customizing-adfs-login-for-sharepoint-2010-how-we-did-it.aspx#578246</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:32:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578246</guid><dc:creator>William van Strien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing; very informative!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578246" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SharePoint 2010 signout different behaviours based on the number of selected Authentication Types</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/12/28/customizing-adfs-login-for-sharepoint-2010-how-we-did-it.aspx#578238</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:18:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578238</guid><dc:creator>BBB - Bas Blogging 'Bout SharePoint</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;While working on our custom ADFS login component and deployed this version to our DTAP street, we saw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578238" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: using the ASP.Net 3.5 ListView within a WebPart - Databinding methods such as Eval(), XPath(), and Bind() can only be used in controls contained in a page. </title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2009/04/06/using-the-asp-net-3-5-listview-within-a-webpart.aspx#578185</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 05:18:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578185</guid><dc:creator>net grid</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The grid provides broad capabilities of working with data such as arbitrary class objects, row arrays, objects implementing IList or IDictionary interfaces and objects with variable number of fields.more information visit dapfor. com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578185" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WSP Deployment scopes and the development lifecycle in large environments</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/07/21/wsp-deployment-scopes-and-the-development-lifecycle-in-large-environments.aspx#578120</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:49:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578120</guid><dc:creator>Victor Vogelpoel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good read on how Achmea (MScc) is using ROSS in deployment. Care to meet up? I&amp;#39;m in Tilburg oct 18th...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578120" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Indexing the new Geolocation field in SharePoint 2013 Technical preview is not possible</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/07/25/indexing-the-new-geolocation-field-in-sharepoint-2013-technical-preview-is-not-possible-yet.aspx#578119</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:24:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578119</guid><dc:creator>Hans Worst</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Bas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was also disappointed that the geolocation fieltd type is not recognized by the index process. Let&amp;#39;s hope it will be possible in the RTM version! I&amp;#39;m curious about your workaround. Calculated column doesn&amp;#39;t work ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you think the new feature of Content Enrichment web service callout is thé way to geoprocess and enrich your data before indexing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We use Esri&amp;#39;s ArcGIS and they offer nice features for SP2010: auto workflow to geoprocess addresses (see: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/webapps/sharepoint/help/0159/015900000027000000.htm"&gt;help.arcgis.com/.../015900000027000000.htm&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Was this the source of inspiration for MS? (de krenten uit de pap)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578119" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SharePoint 2013 geolocation column: a component is not installed</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/07/22/sharepoint-2013-geolocation-column-a-component-is-not-installed.aspx#578042</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:17:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578042</guid><dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;it wasn&amp;#39;t before, otherwise, I wouldn&amp;#39;t blog about it ;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578042" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SharePoint 2013 geolocation column: a component is not installed</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/07/22/sharepoint-2013-geolocation-column-a-component-is-not-installed.aspx#578014</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:26:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578014</guid><dc:creator>N</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj164050"&gt;msdn.microsoft.com/.../jj164050&lt;/a&gt;(v=office.15)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is mention in Geolocation Documentation on MSDN :0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578014" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fast Search for SharePoint: crawler process blocked due to memory capacity limit</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/08/22/fast-search-for-sharepoint-crawler-process-blocked-due-to-memory-capacity-limit.aspx#578012</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:56:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:578012</guid><dc:creator>Roeland Cerfonteijn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In line with the comment by Andreas, also check Mark Priem&amp;#39;s blog how to deal with this in SP2013. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.microsoft.nl/blogs/mpriem/archive/2012/09/05/sharepoint-2013-preview-hungry-search-service.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage"&gt;blogs.microsoft.nl/.../sharepoint-2013-preview-hungry-search-service.aspx&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Method 1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Set-SPEnterpriseSearchService -PerformanceLevel [Reduced |&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maximum |PartiallyReduced] &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Method 2)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;..\15\noderunner.exe.config , memoryLimitMegabytes [0 | 1024 |4096] &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578012" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fast Search for SharePoint: crawler process blocked due to memory capacity limit</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/08/22/fast-search-for-sharepoint-crawler-process-blocked-due-to-memory-capacity-limit.aspx#577983</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:27:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:577983</guid><dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Rob, Totally agree. But on a development machine, we often want to crawl small bits of content. Then it isn&amp;#39;t possible to crawl off office-hours. Experience learns that recycling a w3wp process does have some effect on the small term, but long-term, it doesn&amp;#39;t have too much effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=577983" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fast Search for SharePoint: crawler process blocked due to memory capacity limit</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/bas/archive/2012/08/22/fast-search-for-sharepoint-crawler-process-blocked-due-to-memory-capacity-limit.aspx#577982</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:29:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:577982</guid><dc:creator>Rob van Empel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Bas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason for the 80% is actually a very logical one from an administrative perspective. The crawl is not a critical process; if it fails, the user can still work. If this crawl were allowed to push the resource consumption on the server to 100%, the users would be impacted and other processes might suffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The best way around this is a dedicated crawl server or failing that, crawling during off-hours. In my large farm we originally provisioned 2 dedicated servers just for FAST search crawling (we later decided on another search solution). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another tip: You can make a script that recycles the worker processes (which dumps a lot of memory consumption) just before the crawl starts. But this should be done during off hours as this terminates active sessions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=577982" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>