<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://bloggingabout.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Jeffrey Chilberto - All Comments</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/default.aspx</link><description>.Net Developer</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: BizTalk Map: Choice Element</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2008/02/28/biztalk-map-choice-element.aspx#482837</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:13:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:482837</guid><dc:creator>Rodrigo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m just trying to solve a similar issue by using the existence functoid to identify the corresponding choice element and value mapping functoids to map the values. Is there a reason that made you discard that option?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=482837" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Sharepoint WSS 3.0: Lists.asmx Error Codes</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2008/03/06/sharepoint-wss-3-0-lists-asmx-error-codes.aspx#482722</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:53:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:482722</guid><dc:creator>Tulasi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying add an item which a multivalue lookup field using UpdateListItems() The throwing the invalid data of lookup field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;in which way we have to send the soap request to save the multi values at the time of adding the item.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please suggest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=482722" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Simple Header Example</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2007/07/26/wcf-simple-header-example.aspx#482566</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:31:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:482566</guid><dc:creator>ravi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;how to add and use the wcf plz give the simple example &amp;nbsp;aspshankar@gmail.com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=482566" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Simple Header v1</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/pages/wcf-simple-header-v1.aspx#482470</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:482470</guid><dc:creator>dan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;excelent post&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=482470" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Force NTLM protocol instead of Kerberos in IIS</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2009/07/03/force-ntlm-protocol-instead-of-kerberos-in-iis.aspx#482279</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:33:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:482279</guid><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We would your infrastructure team recommend forcing IIS to use NTLM, instead of setting the site and service up to use Kerberos? &amp;nbsp;I thought that because of security and performance problems with NTLM, the industry was moving to use Kerberos as a standard... but NTLM seems to be a crutch that people lean on, because in most cases it appears to &amp;quot;just work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kerberos is a bit (okay a lot) more difficult to set up, especially when following best practices with least privilege application pool service accounts... but just because it&amp;#39;s more difficult doesn&amp;#39;t mean that we shouldn&amp;#39;t do it. &amp;nbsp;Right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=482279" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Sharepoint WSS: 0x81020014 Error Code</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2008/02/27/sharepoint-wss-0x81020014-error-code.aspx#481926</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:18:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481926</guid><dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;VERY helpful. &amp;nbsp;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481926" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Test Harness: Adding a New Proxy via URL</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/pages/wcf-test-harness-adding-a-new-proxy-via-url.aspx#481906</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:02:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481906</guid><dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When I am trying to add using AddURL, i see following messages but then and error says can&amp;#39;t laod assembly :c:\document and seetings\ user\temp\*.dll as * keeps changing!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I get follwoing message though before error shows&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;downloaded metadata&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;importedmetadata&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;createproxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;writtencode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help is appreciated!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481906" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Simple Header v1</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/pages/wcf-simple-header-v1.aspx#481851</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:58:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481851</guid><dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just wondering if there is supposed to be an &amp;quot;else&amp;quot; between line 63 and 64 of the ServiceContext class?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481851" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Simple Header v1</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/pages/wcf-simple-header-v1.aspx#481811</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:50:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481811</guid><dc:creator>Max</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the best of all solution for WCF SOAP Header!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481811" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BAM Aggregation View: There must be a better way...</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2007/10/03/bam-aggregation-view-there-must-be-a-better-way.aspx#481352</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:40:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481352</guid><dc:creator>BeginningBAM</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any way to represent the Month as October instead of a number&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481352" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Link Listing - February 25, 2009</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2009/02/24/wcf-test-harness-release-1-1-1-1.aspx#481236</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:45:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481236</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Steen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Podcasts Alan Stevens on Community 2.0 [Via: dotnetrocks ] Episode 26: Discovering Azure SQL Services...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481236" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Link Listing - February 25, 2009</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2009/02/24/wcf-test-harness-release-1-1-1-1.aspx#481235</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:45:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481235</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Steen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Link Listing - February 25, 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481235" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>BizTalk: CreateBTSMessage revisited</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2008/08/01/biztalk-create-message-based-on-deployed-schema.aspx#481122</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:41:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481122</guid><dc:creator>Jeffrey Chilberto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is a follow-up to the previous BizTalk: Create Message based on deployed schema post. In the&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481122" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BizTalk: Create Message based on deployed schema</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/archive/2008/08/01/biztalk-create-message-based-on-deployed-schema.aspx#479612</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:39:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:479612</guid><dc:creator>cvndivibr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;pm2g20 &amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://rkxorkuurmzx.com/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;rkxorkuurmzx&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;"&gt;rkxorkuurmzx.com/.../a&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;, [url=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://kgstwcsovxnj.com/"&gt;http://kgstwcsovxnj.com/&lt;/a&gt;]kgstwcsovxnj[/url], [link=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://vgfnwvhqucwo.com/"&gt;http://vgfnwvhqucwo.com/&lt;/a&gt;]vgfnwvhqucwo[/link], &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bubitodrcctj.com/"&gt;http://bubitodrcctj.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=479612" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Test Harness: Overview</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/chilberto/pages/wcf-test-harness-overview.aspx#478997</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:27:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:478997</guid><dc:creator>tcvegcw</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;gA7YDR &amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://jxxlwhqhmoiy.com/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;jxxlwhqhmoiy&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;"&gt;jxxlwhqhmoiy.com/.../a&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;, [url=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://hferrisudoed.com/"&gt;http://hferrisudoed.com/&lt;/a&gt;]hferrisudoed[/url], [link=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://cmgkpzzvxesm.com/"&gt;http://cmgkpzzvxesm.com/&lt;/a&gt;]cmgkpzzvxesm[/link], &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://aemznuyphisl.com/"&gt;http://aemznuyphisl.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=478997" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>