<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://bloggingabout.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Gerben van Loon - All Comments</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/default.aspx</link><description>Random thoughts on Microsoft Software Development and other related stuff</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels comparison update</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2011/08/16/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels-comparison-update.aspx#577168</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:15:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:577168</guid><dc:creator>Javed</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Gerben,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a fantastic comparison table that you have put together. &amp;nbsp;Keep it coming!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-J&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=577168" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>biztalk development</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/06/28/biztalk-vs-appfabric.aspx#576789</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:07:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:576789</guid><dc:creator>biztalk programmer blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I very interested in your post. that is very needful and helpful for the developers. so, thank you for share it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=576789" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>I'm in the MXP for Architects!</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2009/10/30/achmea-microsoft-excellence-program-i-m-in.aspx#576524</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:07:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:576524</guid><dc:creator>BBB - Bas Blogging 'Bout SharePoint</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;the what for Architects?!&amp;quot;, you might ask yourself? MXP stands for Microsoft eXcellence Program&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=576524" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>I'm in the MXP for Architects!</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2009/10/30/achmea-microsoft-excellence-program-i-m-in.aspx#576523</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:05:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:576523</guid><dc:creator>BBB - Bas Blogging 'Bout SharePoint</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;the what for Architects?!&amp;quot;, you might ask yourself? MXP stands for Microsoft eXcellence Program&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=576523" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels comparison update</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/12/20/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels-updated.aspx#548043</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:11:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:548043</guid><dc:creator>Gerben van Loon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wrote a lot about the IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels in the past. Check out my original post and an update&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=548043" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels comparison update</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/02/25/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels.aspx#548042</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:11:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:548042</guid><dc:creator>Gerben van Loon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wrote a lot about the IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels in the past. Check out my original post and an update&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=548042" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels updated</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/12/20/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels-updated.aspx#548018</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:43:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:548018</guid><dc:creator>Gerben van Loon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the info Anthony. Didn&amp;#39;t knew that, haven&amp;#39;t seen it communicated anywhere. I&amp;#39;ll update the comparison table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=548018" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels updated</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/12/20/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels-updated.aspx#545087</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:33:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:545087</guid><dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft appears to have updated their channel to support backout queue:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2459833"&gt;support.microsoft.com/.../2459833&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=545087" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels updated</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/12/20/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels-updated.aspx#489256</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:16:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:489256</guid><dc:creator>Gerben van Loon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes this is possible if you use the WAS listener for IIS7 from the HIS 2010 channel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=489256" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels updated</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/12/20/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels-updated.aspx#486908</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:05:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:486908</guid><dc:creator>Rani</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you enable to use an auto started IIS service upon message put in the MQ ?!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=486908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IBM WMQ WCF Transport channel issues</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/12/20/ibm-wmq-wcf-transport-channel-issues.aspx#486817</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:39:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:486817</guid><dc:creator>Gerben van Loon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the late response: I don&amp;#39;t believe you can ste MQSTR from this channel. In our case it&amp;#39;s concerning another appliction that is sending MQSTR message to our service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=486817" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/02/25/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels.aspx#486816</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:37:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:486816</guid><dc:creator>Gerben van Loon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the late response: nop not used in BizTalk. Only from code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=486816" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Good Online Casino</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/06/28/biztalk-vs-appfabric.aspx#486796</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 11:08:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:486796</guid><dc:creator>Good Online Casino</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It has a deeply integrated service orchestration engine and several model-driven development tools and they as a platform integration solution instead of an application integration solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=486796" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BizTalk vs AppFabric</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/06/28/biztalk-vs-appfabric.aspx#486774</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:53:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:486774</guid><dc:creator>Ariel ITzhaky</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I realy don&amp;#39;t understand why microsoft compete with microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of providing the market with unified products and integration platforms (e.g. enhance biztalk capabilities), they confusing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What should do a customer that invested in BizTalk as his integration platform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I prefer one integration platform with lots of options, then lots of products with specific option and even some overlap between them. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=486774" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IBM WebSphere MQ WCF Channels</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/gerben/archive/2010/02/25/ibm-websphere-mq-wcf-channels.aspx#484847</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:53:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:484847</guid><dc:creator>Jan Odegard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Gerben.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for responding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;#39;t been able to figure out the quirk with uppercase queue manager names, but I was wondering if you have used these channels with BizTalk as well?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using the channels from code, upper case qm names works fine, but not when used as transport channels in a WCF-custom port in BizTalk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=484847" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
