Jean-Paul Smit

Azure - BizTalk - WCF- WF

August 2006 - Posts

Unable to export BAM definition?

Have you ever faced the following error while exporting your BAM definitions to XML from Excel?

Unable to export BAM definition. Transformation of Excel XML to OCW failed.

Check if your Excel file isn't read-only...........

Posted Fri, Aug 25 2006 8:47 AM by Jean-Paul Smit | with no comments

Filed under:

BAM: don't use spaces in view names!

if you're familiair with BAM in BizTalk 2004, it is easy to notice the changes between 2004 and 2006 while setting up a BAM environment in BizTalk 2006.

Changes can be found for example when defining the activities and views. Besides textual changes (on for example buttons) I found out that it is no longer prohibited to use spaces in the names of activities and views. I thought that was a nice improvement to increase readibility.

I still feel that way, but it turned out not to be so handy when you want to remove the views with the BM tool. When you try to remove a view with a space in the name, it gently informs you that such a view doesn't exist! In the BM tool in 2004 it was also possible to remove deployments based on a number, but in 2006 that is no longer the case. Strangely you can view the changes but not remove them anymore.

I tried to remove the views using the stored procedures in the BAMPrimaryImport but I couldn't find an SP to remove the view. I did find one to remove an activity, but there seem to be none for views.

Finally I decided to remove tables, views and so from the database. Obviously that isn't a nice way to solve it.

Does anyone know how to remove a view with a space in its name?

Posted Tue, Aug 15 2006 4:02 PM by Jean-Paul Smit | with no comments

Filed under:

BAM portal (no) views

In the past I worked on BAM with BizTalk 2004. Now I'm on a project with BizTalk 2006 and again I'm the one to do the BAM part.

I played a bit with BAM and 2006 but nothing serious. I under the impression the way BAM in BizTalk 2006 works, or at least the way to create activities and views wasn't changed drastically.

So I went for a basic BAM implementation to get to know the implementation chain. A simple activity in an simple view and the view should show up in the BAM portal. And you can guess it.....it didn't work. There was no view in the view-list and nothing in the eventlog to help me with this. In these scenario's Google is my best friend, so I searched on Biztalk 2006 BAM and "no view to display". I ended up with only result: http://blogs.msdn.com/tihot/archive/2006/06/13/630313.aspx

This also didn't fix the issue.

At the end I suddenly remembered that in 2004 was also necessary to define accounts on the views so users had rights to view them. That actually solved the issue.

Posted Mon, Aug 14 2006 4:17 PM by Jean-Paul Smit | with no comments

Filed under: