<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://bloggingabout.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Pascal Naber - All Comments</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/default.aspx</link><description>.Net</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Edit and Continue on 64 bit Windows | ??nsal D??nmez</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2005/10/20/9913.aspx#485336</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:56:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:485336</guid><dc:creator>Edit and Continue on 64 bit Windows | ??nsal D??nmez</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Edit and Continue on 64 bit Windows | ??nsal D??nmez&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=485336" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WF 4.0 What is different from 3.X part 2</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/05/27/wf-4-0-what-is-different-from-3-x-part-2.aspx#484128</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:32:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:484128</guid><dc:creator>Pascal Naber</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel, the concepts are the same, but overall everything is changed. If you don&amp;#39;t have any requirements with your project to use 3.5, I would start with 4.0. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.5 is legacy...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=484128" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WF 4.0 What is different from 3.X part 2</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/05/27/wf-4-0-what-is-different-from-3-x-part-2.aspx#484123</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:42:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:484123</guid><dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;i&amp;#39;m starting with WF...should i start with 3.5 or 4.0..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=484123" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WF 4.0 What is different from 3.X</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/05/20/wf-4-0-what-is-different-from-3-x.aspx#482740</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:10:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:482740</guid><dc:creator>raffaeu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This simply sucks! We are not talking about moving from WinForm to WPF but to &amp;#39;upgrade&amp;#39; an existing tool, WF. In this Microsoft did a big mistake, can you imagine big companies, like mine, that has spent time in separating the business logic using WF 3.5 that now have to redesign from scratch everything? Really bad. I think that I won&amp;#39;t migrate to it for at least the next 12 months ... really really bad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=482740" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BizTalk 2009 Free Microsoft downloads: overview</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/04/21/biztalk-2009-free-microsoft-downloads-overview.aspx#481969</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481969</guid><dc:creator>Try Soft</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A great service you are providing. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481969" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Free VS.NET 2005 like docking including tabbed MDI</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2006/02/28/11185.aspx#481931</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:09:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481931</guid><dc:creator>ankaj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;i need to have the concept of docking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481931" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BizTalk 2009 Free Microsoft downloads: overview</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/04/21/biztalk-2009-free-microsoft-downloads-overview.aspx#481894</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481894</guid><dc:creator>freak00</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;hei... your blog is very interesting, thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481894" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WF 4.0 What is different from 3.X part 2</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/05/27/wf-4-0-what-is-different-from-3-x-part-2.aspx#481859</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:28:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481859</guid><dc:creator>Marcel Bradea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great list of changes to come! Great to know what things to watch out for in current architecture, such as rules not being run from files anymore and conditions being specified in VB etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great work!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481859" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: .NET 3.5 WF beta 2 SendActivity and generated proxy class</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2007/08/14/net-3-5-wf-beta-2-sendactivity-and-generated-proxy-class.aspx#481848</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:52:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481848</guid><dc:creator>lisha</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have the same problem. Changing it in all the 3 places mentioned above has not solved it. Any other suggestions please.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481848" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>WF 4.0 What is different from 3.X part 2</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/05/20/wf-4-0-what-is-different-from-3-x.aspx#481710</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:54:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481710</guid><dc:creator>Pascal Naber</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some more facts about WF 4.0. Part 1 can be found here There is no rule engine anymore! Workflows have&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481710" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>WF 4.0 What is different from 3.X part 2</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/05/20/wf-4-0-what-is-different-from-3-x.aspx#481708</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:13:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481708</guid><dc:creator>Pascal Naber</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some more facts about WF 4.0. Part 1 can be found here There is no rule engine anymore! Workflows have&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481708" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Noticias 26-Mayo-2009</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2009/05/20/wf-4-0-what-is-different-from-3-x.aspx#481703</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:02:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481703</guid><dc:creator>La Web de Programación</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Service Pack 2 para Windows Vista y Windows 2008 disponible públicamente : Versión 32 bits y versión&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481703" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Free VS.NET 2005 like docking including tabbed MDI</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2006/02/28/11185.aspx#481645</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:53:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:481645</guid><dc:creator>Henry Torres</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;AvalonDock is only for WPF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=481645" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Call .NET code from XSLT</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2005/04/21/3658.aspx#477999</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:41:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:477999</guid><dc:creator>Pascal Naber</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The replace method exists on the XpathExtension class. xPathExtension is an instance of this class.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=477999" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Call .NET code from XSLT</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/pascal/archive/2005/04/21/3658.aspx#477991</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:20:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:477991</guid><dc:creator>SANGEETA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you please explain that where replace method exist &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=477991" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
