<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://bloggingabout.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Ramon Smits - All Comments</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/default.aspx</link><description>Tell me your secrets and i&amp;#39;ll tell you mine</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>re: WCF and large messages</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2008/08/20/wcf-and-large-messages.aspx#472224</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:24:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:472224</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Ramon,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have a look at this post : &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/10/03/beware-of-default-settings-in-wcf.aspx"&gt;bloggingabout.net/.../beware-of-default-settings-in-wcf.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe tip 4 : &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://davidpallmann.spaces.live.com/blog/cns"&gt;davidpallmann.spaces.live.com/.../cns&lt;/a&gt;!E95EF9DC3FDB978E!260.entry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;covers this blog entry. Have a look cause there are several other things you can run into......&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=472224" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Enso is now part of my must have list</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2008/06/01/enso-is-now-part-of-my-must-have-list.aspx#460153</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:44:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:460153</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been using it for the last month or two, and it&amp;#39;s a really good one :) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=460153" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>wakeup on lan</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2008/04/16/hibernate-or-standby-wakes-up-computer-in-seconds.aspx#458767</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:19:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:458767</guid><dc:creator>wakeup on lan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;wakeup on lan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=458767" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WM_QueryEndSession use WndProc not DefWndProc</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2005/08/10/8868.aspx#160307</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:52:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:160307</guid><dc:creator>Phil Winant</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't feel bad. I just did the EXACT SAME THING!!! I only found your website because I was trying to figure out what the difference between the two methods was. :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=160307" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Get the physical path of a path that uses a subst drive</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2007/04/05/get-the-physical-path-of-a-path-that-uses-a-subst-drive.aspx#154778</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 06:06:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:154778</guid><dc:creator>Ramon Smits</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If I would have the sourcecode of your code then I probably would have used that as a base for this implementation :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=154778" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Get the physical path of a path that uses a subst drive</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2007/04/05/get-the-physical-path-of-a-path-that-uses-a-subst-drive.aspx#154201</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:18:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:154201</guid><dc:creator>guidol</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a fine piece of work!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I invented the same thing when we where working at BuZa together. I even blogged about it at the corporate blog (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.infosupport.com/guidol/archive/2005/05/23/338.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.infosupport.com/guidol/archive/2005/05/23/338.aspx&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=154201" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Passed for 070-315 and 070-320</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2005/11/21/10338.aspx#150509</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:20:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:150509</guid><dc:creator>srk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;hii .. i passed 070-229 &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;designing and implementing databases with microsoft sql server!! i got 839 but i dono how much he exam is for... &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=150509" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Use command line option '/keyfile' or appropriate project settings instead of 'AssemblyKeyFile'</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2005/12/26/sign-assembly-with-microsoft-visual-csharp-2005-express-edition.aspx#127542</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:02:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:127542</guid><dc:creator>simon831</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have a look at this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2006/04/24/582278.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2006/04/24/582278.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=127542" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Weird php session behaviour</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2006/10/27/Weird-php-session-behaviour.aspx#106312</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:30:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:106312</guid><dc:creator>John Hansen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you so much! This saved me a MAJOR headache here at work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=106312" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Don't use viewstate compression! Use http compression instead!</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2006/09/01/Don_2700_t-use-viewstate-compression_2100_-Use-http-compression-instead_2100_.aspx#96989</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:50:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:96989</guid><dc:creator>Ramon Smits</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I did not know that the browser does not compress its POST data when the previous GET/POST returned compressed. So thanks for that comment!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But when you have a viewstate of 60k+ then you have a design issue. I really don't see why you would ping/pong that much data on a round-trip. This will result in a double compress. First the viewstate and then http compression for the html.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=96989" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Don't use viewstate compression! Use http compression instead!</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2006/09/01/Don_2700_t-use-viewstate-compression_2100_-Use-http-compression-instead_2100_.aspx#96903</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:36:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:96903</guid><dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; well, http compression works only from the server to the client, but when the client does a postback, the viewstate is sent to the server uncompressed! This is why compressing (and uncompressing) the viewstate is useful... you know, most of the adsl connectivity has a very low upload bandwidth, so it is hard to send 60k of viewstate for each postback... :S&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cu!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=96903" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Triple tagged</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2007/01/08/help-i-ve-been-tagged-by-edward.aspx#91803</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:52:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:91803</guid><dc:creator>Erno de Weerd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday when I read Rory's[1] blog and Jason's[2] blog I wondered how long it would take me to get&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=91803" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why read uncommitted data?</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2006/12/19/why-read-uncommitted-data.aspx#78787</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:02:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:78787</guid><dc:creator>Ramon Smits</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Erwyn: You are correct but I should have noted that this is not the case if the where clause is generated with time information that is committed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you don't have this type of (meta) data then dirty reads are possible. This is acceptable in most reporting scenarios that access data that gets not altered after insert.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=78787" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why read uncommitted data?</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2006/12/19/why-read-uncommitted-data.aspx#78779</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:46:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:78779</guid><dc:creator>Erwyn van der Meer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with your point. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, you write &amp;quot;You know in advance that you will never read dirty data because you only do inserts.&amp;quot;. That is not true. If the insert is done from a transaction that is rolled back, the insert is reversed and you might have read dirty (uncommitted) data while the transaction was in progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you accept that this might happen, then there is no problem and reading uncommitted data indeed circumvents locking problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=78779" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why read uncommitted data?</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/ramon/archive/2006/09/29/Change-the-isolation-leven-to-read-uncommitted-data-in-MSSQL.aspx#78741</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:26:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:78741</guid><dc:creator>Ramon Smits</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I just read Dennis post about his adventures in isolation level land . He says he does not know a good&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=78741" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>