A couple of good sources for those who need to decide: Capability comparison made by Morgan Soley. Half year old but with a feature comparison table. Recently updated comparison by Andrew Kazyrevich. TypeMock Isolator is a clear winner if it fits in your budget. Otherwise Rhino Mocks or Moq seem to be...
TypeMock is has announced ASP.NET Bundle (consisting of Isolator and Ivonna). Being TypeMock user and customer, I am distributing their announcement. The text below is not mine – it’s written by TypeMock and explains how to get a free ASP.NET Bundle license (if you hurry up, like me :-)) Unit Testing...
Part 1 Part 2 I promised to address matching reference and output arguments using lambda-based syntax that I proposed for TypeMock Isolator. Before getting there I would like to retract my original comment that faked method’s arguments should be matched by default. I still think that, like strong typing...
I was glad to see that my thoughts about figuring out the best syntax to control the match of faked method’s arguments haven’t been unnoticed by TypeMockians. Eli Lopian raised a few questions, and addressing them seems to be crucial for materialization of the whole idea. 1. Backward compatibility with...
I enjoy compactness and clarity of TypeMock Isolator AAA syntax. But it still lacks certain features in comparison with the original RecordExpectation-based syntax. One of such features is support for exact match of method's attributes. Here's an example (I assume that MyClass is a static class...