<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://bloggingabout.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Waseem Sadiq - All Comments</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/default.aspx</link><description>Waseem on software development and information technology</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Hunting for window handles</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/11/23/Hunting-for-window-handles.aspx#55018</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:32:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:55018</guid><dc:creator>Jan Schreuder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What you should also consider is looking at how popup forms are handled. I always use a construct that calls the winform inside a using. For example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using (MyForm form = new MyForm())&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;{&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;form.showdialog();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an object exposes the Dispose() method, it is always a wise thing to call Dispose() once you no longer need the object.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=55018" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using generics to easy the pain of (xml) serialization</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/11/22/Using-generics-to-easy-the-pain-of-_2800_xml_2900_-serialization.aspx#54567</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:05:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:54567</guid><dc:creator>Waseem Sadiq</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You are absolutely right, that's a nice trick :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But still this approach is preferred in situations where you are doing a lot of late-bound instantiation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=54567" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using generics to easy the pain of (xml) serialization</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/11/22/Using-generics-to-easy-the-pain-of-_2800_xml_2900_-serialization.aspx#54562</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:40:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:54562</guid><dc:creator>Marc Jacobi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;....but, this would work, wouldn't it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;void SerializeResponse(Response response)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;{&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;{&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;XmlSerializer ser = new XmlSerializer(response.GetType());&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;ser.Serialize(ms, response);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=54562" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google code-search</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/10/05/Google-code_2D00_search.aspx#28252</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:24:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:28252</guid><dc:creator>Jan Schreuder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't know this either. But it's a great way to find source code. There's also another option which allows you to search for Microsoft related content only:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.google.com/microsoft"&gt;http://www.google.com/microsoft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=28252" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google code-search</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/10/05/Google-code_2D00_search.aspx#28195</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:20:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:28195</guid><dc:creator>Ramon Smits</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I did not know the existence of this seach engine :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After searching for 'effect plasma lang:c#' I got my own code back that is available at my blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=28195" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WPF - local animations (animations in code)</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/02/28/11183.aspx#12521</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:59:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:12521</guid><dc:creator>Peter Fisk</dc:creator><description>Very interesting.

I am implementing WPF animations directly in Smalltalk without using XAML.

Your post helped clarify some concepts for me.

Thanks
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12521" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WPF - local animations (animations in code)</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/02/28/11183.aspx#12395</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:53:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:12395</guid><dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator><description>Hi,I've problem.
I have put this code in my application to animate a Label, i.e. myLabel.

if I write 
...
Storyboard.SetTargetName(da1, myLabel.Name);
Storyboard.SetTargetName(da2, myLabel.Name);
...
an exception occours :

'' name cannot be found in the name scope of 'System.Windows.Controls.Canvas'.

Can you help me?
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12395" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WinFX runtime beta2 installation fails</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/06/03/12361.aspx#12380</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:56:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:12380</guid><dc:creator>Sander van Vliet</dc:creator><description>This has almost always something to do with a not fully uninstalled previous version. Though it can be _any_ beta software and not just the one you're trying to update.
As you said, it's a painfull process :-/&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12380" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Running XQuery in a OR-Mapper world</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/05/21/12220.aspx#12230</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 07:29:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:12230</guid><dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator><description>Try LLBLGen Pro. Version 2.0 is in beta now.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12230" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Smart Client vs Web Applications</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2005/12/06/10469.aspx#12109</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 12:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:12109</guid><dc:creator>Technical Thoughts of Jorriss</dc:creator><description>In the office we're currently investigating Smart Client vs Web Applications. It seems that I'm not alone....&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12109" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Flags enumeration sample</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/04/04/11899.aspx#11900</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:03:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:11900</guid><dc:creator>Ramon Smits</dc:creator><description>lots of days that I miss the c++ syntax to just do if(options&amp;amp;singleOption) { ..... }&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way.. Its better to renamen IsOptionSet to IsSet(..) and rename singleOption to value because it doesn't really has to be a single option. It can also be some OR'd options.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just my 2 cents.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11900" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WPF - custom types and polymorphism</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2006/02/28/11182.aspx#11661</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:01:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:11661</guid><dc:creator>chinimimita</dc:creator><description>Hi! Somehow your blog enlightened me but I think I still need an example in creating custom control. I'm actually doing a custom control in listview I've done this with c# but dont have any idea on how to do inheriting in xaml. Hope you can help me. Thanks!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11661" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Atlas InvokeMethodAction is case-sensitive</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2005/11/22/10354.aspx#10360</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:37:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:10360</guid><dc:creator>Marc Jacobi</dc:creator><description>Isn't this because javascript is case sensitive and Atlas just generates javascript?&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10360" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introduction and hello</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2005/10/27/Introduction.aspx#10066</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:55:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:10066</guid><dc:creator>Arno van Nijnatten</dc:creator><description>Hey Waseem,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cool that you are blogging here now. Been a long time we have talked to each other (I think a year ago @ Moxmo ;-). Looking forward to see some interesting posts from you!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10066" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introduction and hello</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/waseem/archive/2005/10/27/Introduction.aspx#10050</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:57:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:10050</guid><dc:creator>Dennis van der Stelt</dc:creator><description>Indeed, welcome!&lt;br&gt;Macaw on their way to BloggingAbout.NET domination! :)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10050" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>