<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://bloggingabout.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Patrick Wellink</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/default.aspx</link><description>BizTalk Server 2004 / 2006, Using C#, Disposing VB and anything else I want to share with the community</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>Excellent post of Charles Young about Dublin and BizTalk</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/10/16/excellent-post-of-charles-young-about-dublin-and-biztalk.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:475614</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=475614</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/10/16/excellent-post-of-charles-young-about-dublin-and-biztalk.aspx#comments</comments><description>I was reading the post of Charles Young about Dublin and BizTalk Server - What&amp;#39;s the difference? I can only say, it&amp;#39;s really worth a read, and after reading it, you will probably know you will still be doing BizTalk and XLANG for a long time....(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/10/16/excellent-post-of-charles-young-about-dublin-and-biztalk.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=475614" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/OSLO/default.aspx">OSLO</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/DUBLIN/default.aspx">DUBLIN</category></item><item><title>How to expose an old style WSDL (Flattened) with the schema's included from BizTalk 2006 R2 with a WCF adapter</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/10/06/how-to-expose-an-old-style-wsdl-with-the-schema-s-included-from-biztalk-2006-r2.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:475144</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=475144</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/10/06/how-to-expose-an-old-style-wsdl-with-the-schema-s-included-from-biztalk-2006-r2.aspx#comments</comments><description>It is really nice to have WCF around. With WCF you are ready for the future. Unfortunaltely this is only true in a Microsoft landscape. The new style WSDL with the schema&amp;#39;s no longer included is one of those enhancements that should be really nice...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/10/06/how-to-expose-an-old-style-wsdl-with-the-schema-s-included-from-biztalk-2006-r2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=475144" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/WCF/default.aspx">WCF</category></item><item><title>Interesting stuff coming with the BizTalk Adaper Pack</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/08/15/interesting-stuff-coming-with-the-biztalk-adaper-pack.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:471844</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=471844</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/08/15/interesting-stuff-coming-with-the-biztalk-adaper-pack.aspx#comments</comments><description>I really can&amp;#39;t wait for the BizTalk Adapter pack. Finally we get a good SQL adapter capable of almost everything. I had concurrency problems in the past cause the Adapter always has a transaction level Serializable. Now with the new SQL Adapter the...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/08/15/interesting-stuff-coming-with-the-biztalk-adaper-pack.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=471844" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/WCF/default.aspx">WCF</category></item><item><title>HowTo define a Custom Soap Header in BizTalk. Expose it, Consume it , even map them..</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/06/13/howto-define-a-custom-soap-header-in-biztalk.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:460257</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=460257</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/06/13/howto-define-a-custom-soap-header-in-biztalk.aspx#comments</comments><description>1. Create the schema that defines your custom header. This schema should be a NORMAL schema. (Give it a decent rootnode name) 2. Create a PROPERTY schema with TargetNamespace : http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/SOAPHeader . 3. Make sure you define...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/06/13/howto-define-a-custom-soap-header-in-biztalk.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=460257" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/ESB/default.aspx">ESB</category></item><item><title>New Style SSO Available on Codeplex</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/06/02/new-style-sso-available-on-codeplex.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:459763</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=459763</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/06/02/new-style-sso-available-on-codeplex.aspx#comments</comments><description>If you are working with BizTalk you know the dilemma, where do I store my configuration data. Could be on several locations. Have a read of this article to have some in-dept information . I created a base class SSOBaseFunctionality thad deals with storing...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/06/02/new-style-sso-available-on-codeplex.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=459763" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/SSO/default.aspx">SSO</category></item><item><title>Choosing the Right Workflow Tool for Your Project</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/04/28/choosing-the-right-workflow-tool-for-your-project.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:458518</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=458518</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/04/28/choosing-the-right-workflow-tool-for-your-project.aspx#comments</comments><description>And another interesting artickle here &amp;gt;&amp;gt; CLICK &amp;lt;&amp;lt; about Choosing the Right Workflow Tool for Your Project...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/04/28/choosing-the-right-workflow-tool-for-your-project.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=458518" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category></item><item><title>Some guidance on BizTalk Testing.</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/04/28/some-guidance-on-biztalk-testing.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:458512</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=458512</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/04/28/some-guidance-on-biztalk-testing.aspx#comments</comments><description>Via BlogLines I monotor lot&amp;#39;s of BizTalk feeds. And once in a while there is an article worth reading. The same with this article &amp;gt;&amp;gt; CLICK &amp;lt;&amp;lt; from michael Stepenson. It has some interesting points about BizTalk testing. Worth a read....(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/04/28/some-guidance-on-biztalk-testing.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=458512" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category></item><item><title>Using a Bitwise AND in a BizTalk Send Port as a Filter Expression</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/03/20/using-a-bitwise-and-in-a-biztalk-send-port-as-a-filter-expression.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:458058</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=458058</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/03/20/using-a-bitwise-and-in-a-biztalk-send-port-as-a-filter-expression.aspx#comments</comments><description>I knew this was possible but I guess a lot of people are unaware of this functionality. Somebody told me I should blog about it, so here I am adding another entry to my Blog. How to define the BitWise and in a send port. Define a property schema in biztalk...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/03/20/using-a-bitwise-and-in-a-biztalk-send-port-as-a-filter-expression.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=458058" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category></item><item><title>Microsoft BizTalk Server Operations Guide</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/19/microsoft-biztalk-server-operations-guide.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:457908</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=457908</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/19/microsoft-biztalk-server-operations-guide.aspx#comments</comments><description>This is a post from Microsft Download Center. I found it in my RSS feeds. (Don&amp;#39;t know where). It&amp;#39;s such a usable BizTalk document that I really don&amp;#39;t want to loose the link so it&amp;#39;s a reminder for myself. But a nice read (+700 pages) for...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/19/microsoft-biztalk-server-operations-guide.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=457908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category></item><item><title>Suspended Messages are Included in the Message Count in Database Throttling Threshold</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/14/suspended-messages-are-included-in-the-message-count-in-database-throttling-threshold.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:457888</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=457888</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/14/suspended-messages-are-included-in-the-message-count-in-database-throttling-threshold.aspx#comments</comments><description>I had read this once but I couldn&amp;#39;t remember where. But it can be of importance to BizTalk developers when they have the question : &amp;quot; To Suspend or Not to Suspend &amp;quot;. When you are faced with this question, remember that Suspended Messages...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/14/suspended-messages-are-included-in-the-message-count-in-database-throttling-threshold.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=457888" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category></item><item><title>Finally Project templates in BizTalk 2006 / BizTalk Template Wizard</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/11/finally-templates-and-biztalk-2006.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:457880</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=457880</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/11/finally-templates-and-biztalk-2006.aspx#comments</comments><description>I have a certain aproach on how to solve common integration scenarios. It involves Process Services, Business Services, Receiving Interation services and Sending Integration Services. It&amp;#39;s a clean way to set up an integration. Although it is a flexible...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/02/11/finally-templates-and-biztalk-2006.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=457880" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category></item><item><title>The truth about Dynamic SQL and Stored Procedures....</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/01/07/the-truth-about-dynamic-sql-and-stored-procedures.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 08:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:454363</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=454363</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/01/07/the-truth-about-dynamic-sql-and-stored-procedures.aspx#comments</comments><description>Well I am not going to say what&amp;#39;s better or what I prefer, but I can only give my view of things. What everybody seems to forget is that an external person with very good understanding of SQL ( commonly know as a DBA ) can solve performance problems...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2008/01/07/the-truth-about-dynamic-sql-and-stored-procedures.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=454363" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category></item><item><title>Some very interesting BixTalk/WCF screencasts</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/12/14/some-very-interesting-bixtalk-wcf-screencasts.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:445831</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=445831</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/12/14/some-very-interesting-bixtalk-wcf-screencasts.aspx#comments</comments><description>I was looking at my list of Blog entries at bloglines and I saw an interesting screen cast from Aaron Skonnard I decided to have a look and was surprised to see how many extra functionality is provided by the WCF adapters. I decided to look at some more...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/12/14/some-very-interesting-bixtalk-wcf-screencasts.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445831" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/WCF/default.aspx">WCF</category></item><item><title>BizTalk ESB guidance Available on MSDN</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/11/09/biztalk-esb-guidance-available-on-msdn.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:421852</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=421852</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/11/09/biztalk-esb-guidance-available-on-msdn.aspx#comments</comments><description>Yesterday it was my Birthday and how nice of Microsoft to give me what I really wanted .... The BizTalk ESB guidance is available for download NOW Go and get it here : http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e3957253-24ce-45aa-ac32-60abffe15bac&amp;amp;DisplayLang...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/11/09/biztalk-esb-guidance-available-on-msdn.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=421852" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/ESB/default.aspx">ESB</category></item><item><title>BizTalk V-Next</title><link>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/10/29/biztalk-v-next.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">813b6dfd-644e-4573-a816-eebab56ba0d0:413530</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wellink</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=413530</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/10/29/biztalk-v-next.aspx#comments</comments><description>At last they have shed some light on what the next version will be : Service Oriented Architecture • Deeper alignment with the .NET Framework – Building deeply on the investments made with Windows Communication Foundation and Windows Workflow Foundation...(&lt;a href="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/2007/10/29/biztalk-v-next.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://bloggingabout.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=413530" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/ESB/default.aspx">ESB</category><category domain="http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/wellink/archive/tags/WCF/default.aspx">WCF</category></item></channel></rss>